There are some interesting things to note about the way the evangelists handled the actual crucifixion. Next, there is the lack of detail. Various evangelists give more attention to those crucified with him Luke and John or the place John or the division of clothes Matthew in the relevant lines than to the act of crucifixion.
There are also no words dedicated to reactions or pain, or specific recollections of scripture passages. Since each gospel details the particulars of the passion more than any other moment of the life of Christ, this laconic approach has the paradoxical effects of resounding like a gong through the community of the faithful. Anyone who has experienced a Palm Sunday or Good Friday mass knows that these few words are like a thunderclap.
In John , St. The Old Testament also makes a point about piercing hands and feet. The Septuagint the Greek Old Testament that would have been familiar to the early church has the reading of Psalm which is now used in most modern Christian translations.
In brief, the sentence has no verb in the Hebrew Masoretic text. None of them mention the kind of cross that is used. And the practice was not confined to Rome. Josephus tells us that Pharisees were crucified while their wives and children were slaughtered in front of them under Sadducean high priest Alexander Janneus 2nd century BC. This form of punishment was meant to evoke Deuteronomy —23 to prove that the executed were cursed by God. Thus, in the time of Jesus, crucifixion was as cruel and despicable as a punishment could be.
No other means of killing Jesus would have sent quite the same message of brutality and damnation. The cross itself varied throughout Rome. Sometimes it was just a vertical stake planted in the ground, but it was more common to affix the arms of the victim to a horizontal piece patibulum. The condemned carried either the entire cross or the just the horizontal piece.
They were stripped naked, tied or nailed to the cross, and sometimes seated on a kind of peg called a sedile on the vertical post. Feet and heels were tied or nailed to the upright. The victim may also have been tied by the arms, legs, or torso.
Seneca the Younger describes variations, including crucifying people upside down and impaling the genitals. Thus we can see that nailing was not uncommon in crucifixion. Given how it was practiced at the Fall of Jerusalem only four decades after the death of Jesus , we might fairly assume nailing was a norm at this time.
The audience would already know. References to the crucifixion in the early Church Father sometimes indicate different types of cross and often refer to the nails.
Nails appear in other early sources. The non-canonical Gospel of Peter c. These are just a few examples that show the consistent belief that Jesus was nailed to the cross. Although gospel passages concerning the crucifixion are silent, the Church herself sings out the fact that He was pierced for our transgressions, and by those wounds we are healed.
Another issue to be settled is how many nails were used in the crucifixion. Ambrose, in the earliest written mention of the relics of the crucifixion, only accounts for two:.
Helen] sought the nails with which the Lord was crucified, and found them. From one nail she ordered a bridle to be made, from the other she wove a diadem. Mary was visited to liberate Eve; Helena was visited that emperors might be redeemed. So she sent to her son Constantine a diadem adorned with jewels which were interwoven with the iron of the Cross and enclosed the more precious jewel of divine redemption.
She sent the bridle, also. Constantine used both, and transmitted his faith to later kings. And so the beginning of the faith of the emperors is the holy relic which is upon the bridle. From that came the faith whereby persecution ended and devotion to God took its place. It is a symbol of trinity; the Father 56 47 , the Mother 48 and the Child Together, Mano Pantea Trinity forms a nice equation:.
This simple addition teaches us the only relevant knowledge and understanding that is needed for illumination. This equation can be read e. These numbers and symbols describe the whole Way of Truth with its three phases: First, there is Father and Spirit 56 , then the soul is purified by denying oneself , and finally, a person experiences transfiguration and thus becomes the Living Spirit Numbers 5 and 6 were also discovered in the background Mona Lisa in Image Number was discovered in the left lower corner of Mona Lisa del Prado in Image 8.
Number appears in the height of Mona Lisa, which was presented in Image 3. There was also shown its connection with the number Nag Hammadi texts. Leonardo was indeed very familiar with the Mano Pantea symbol. He actually used it in the portrait of Jesus Christ in his painting Salvator Mundi. Related: 8 archaeological sites that Jesus may have visited. For example, the ratios of isotopes of carbon and oxygen — variants of these elements — in both sets of samples suggested they both came from an abnormally humid environment, and they both had significant "flowstone deposits" —— layers of calcite carbonate formed by flowing water.
These findings match the conditions in the Caiaphas tomb, which is located near an ancient aqueduct and often would have been flooded by its overflow. The researchers also found evidence on both the nails and the ossuaries of a specific fungus — an unusual type of yeast — that grows only in very damp conditions and has been found in no other tomb in Jerusalem.
Their analysis of the nails with an electron microscope also found slivers of wood on the nails, which they recognized as cedar, and tiny fragments of bone —— unfortunately now fossilized. Those discoveries heightened the possibility that the nails came from a crucifixion, but they did not prove it, Shimron said. The IAA says their records show that two iron nails were also found in the Caiaphas tomb — one inside an unmarked ossuary and another on the ground near the ornate ossuary, possibly where it fell when it was disturbed by tomb robbers — but they were later lost.
The excavator of that tomb suggested they might have been used to scratch inscriptions on the ossuaries, but that idea was never investigated, Shimron said. The new study indicated the nails from Tel Aviv University were indeed those lost from the Caiaphas tomb, despite the IAA's denial, he said.
Related: 7 biblical artifacts that will probably never be found. According to the theory presented in Jacobovici's documentary, they might have been buried with Caiaphas because crucifixion nails were thought to be magical — a belief noted in ancient Jewish writings.
And because Caiaphas is only known for his role in the crucifixion of Jesus, it's possible that the nails are linked with that event — although it can only be a supposition, Shimron said.
Hershkovitz, who still has possession of the two nails, told Live Science he was not convinced by the latest study, but he did not rule out the possibility that the nails came from the Caiaphas tomb. The nails are long enough to have been used on a person's hands in a crucifixion, and they are bent upward at the end, — perhaps to prevent the hands being lifted off the cross, he said.
0コメント